The Board of Directors of The Safehaven Project for Community Living are elected at each Annual Meeting of the Corporation. Not less than half are members of the immediate family of individuals who are served by Safehaven. Each are elected for 2-year terms and are members in good standing of The Safehaven Project for Community Living.

Our Mission

To provide a home for life or until such a time as comparable adult accommodation can be found as well as respite to children and youth with multiple disabilities and complex medical needs.

 
MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING: SEPTEMBER 12, 2006
NEW! View Other Meeting Minutes in the Minutes Archive

IN ATTENDANCE

  • BERRY, Jim - President
  • BOGOROCH, Richard
  • HORTIGUELA, Val
  • ISRAELSON, David
  • LAURENT, André - Vice President
  • LeBLANC, Ann - Secretary

ABSENT

  • ALTON, Sharon
  • BUNTING, John - Treasurer
  • BYGRAVE, Courtenay
  • COHEN, Mitchell
  • COLDHAM, Nancy
  • HARGROVE, Marta

INVITEES

  • GORDON, Beverley - Executive Director
  • GUDOFSKY, Susan - Public Relations and Fundraising
  • KOHALMI, Sharon - Program Supervisor, Ministry of Children and Youth
 
 
ITEM

1) Call meeting to order:

Meeting was called to order at 7:20 pm. As there wasn't a quorum for the meeting, all motions were passed subject to ratification at the October 24, 2006 meeting.

2) Introduction and Discussion with Sharon Kohalmi:

Jim Berry introduced Sharon Kohalmi, Program Supervisor. Sharon reiterated the Ministry's commitment to the grandfathered residents and spoke about the advantages of Safehaven declaring itself an adult and children's organization. Regardless of the Board's decision, the Ministry felt it was very important that Safehaven remain at the children's and adults planning tables.

The following is a summary of what Sharon Kohalmi saw as the advantages of becoming an adult and children's organization:

Advantages:

  • Would receive recognition for servicing adults
  • Would establish a relationship with Ministry of Community and Social Services which may open venues for funding
  • Gain greater understanding with adult service providers
  • May lead to greater opportunity to access different funding indicatives
  • Would give the Ministry greater flexibility in accessing future funding

Sharon Kolhami reaffirmed David Mason's message to Jim Berry September 11, 2006 that although the Ministry was unable to find money from existing funding initiatives for any of the alternatives presented in Safehaven's February 2006 business case, they would continue their best efforts to foster future development activities with Safehaven as future initiatives are introduced.

Jim Berry thanked Sharon Kolhami for attending the Board meeting and delivering a hard, disappointing message to the Safehaven Board.

Jim Berry shared with the Board that the meeting arranged with the Minister Meilleur could not have come at a better time. Jim Berry, David Israelson and Beverley Gordon would be meeting with the Minister on September 13, 2006 from 10:00am -10:45am to thank the Minister for our 16 years of successful partnership and to discuss that Safehaven's present children's funding could not support the present and future needs of 13 over 21 year olds.

3) Review of Meeting minutes:
  
MOTION: Richard Bogoroch
SECOND: David Israelson
CARRIED: That the minutes of the June 13, 2006 Board meeting be accepted as presented.

4) Correspondence:

No correspondence.

5) Business arising from previous minutes:

a) Follow-up sheet:

i. Strategic Direction committee chaired by John Bunting had met three times. One meeting was facilitated by Wayne Stark, principal Pursuit. One meeting of the three committee members and one conference call which included Jim Berry. In John Bunting's absence, Jim presented the strategic direction for the Board's consideration:

  • Strategic Initiative #1 - we must create a financially sustainable solution for Safehaven in respect of the grandfathered residents. This could include obtaining additional government funding, developing a new model of care and/or seeking additional financial support from our exiting users.
  • Strategic Initiative #2 - we should locate and develop (at least) one new facility to increase the number of respite care beds we offer the community. We should not, in the period defined by these strategic initiatives, increase the number of residential beds.
  • Strategic Initiative #3 - we should establish a Foundation and create a clear fundraising strategy for the Foundation that is congruent with Strategic Initiative #2 and the ongoing needs of Safehaven.
  • Strategic Initiative #4 - we should conclude on our community awareness and branding initiative and ensure any steps necessary to "rebrand" Safehaven are implemented.

Board agreed to meet on October 24, 2006 at 7:00 pm to develop an action plan around the four proposed strategic directions.

ii) By-Law Committee will be meeting on October 5, 2006 with the understanding that they need to develop their recommendations and secure Board endorsement in time for a special members meeting not later than May 2007.

iii) Jim Berry shared his notes from his September 6, 2006 discussion with Clifford Goldfarb:

  • His Health Law practice has provided an opinion that Safehaven does fall within the ambit of the Local Health System Integration Act (LIN). The regulations are still being finalized so the full colour of the implications can not be known at this point. One certain hazard is the legislation's provision for the Ministry to attach any endowment of a LHIN and move it as they see fit.
  • The cost issue of establishing a foundation and effecting the appropriate transfers and agreements is pending resolution of item three. With respect to a trust agreement governing asset transfer to a foundation, such an agreement would provide a barrier to attachment by a third party for up to five years, and thereafter a reasonably secure bar.
  • There is a potential tax issue with respect to the transfer of Bloor to a foundation. Specifically, the language of the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation (MPAC) exemption relates specifically to children and there has been some aggressive enforcement in recent years.

Gardner Roberts uses Ben Blufarb as council on such matters. His estimate is that it would cost $2-3,000 to work with MPAC to get an opinion with respect to the exemption prior to establishing a foundation and a ruling thereafter.

RECOMMENDATION: Authorize Blufarb to pursue an opinion prior to establishing the foundation.

MOTION: Richard Bogoroch
SECOND: Ann LeBlanc
PENDING RATIFICATION: That Safehaven request Gardner Roberts to pursue an opinion from MPAC prior to establishing a foundation.

6) Committee reports:

a) Membership:

MOTION: Ann LeBlanc
SECOND: André Laurent
PENDING RATIFICATION: To accept the names brought forth as voting members of the Corporation for 2006-2007

b) Reputation Audit:

Val Hortiguela reported in Nancy Coldham's absence:

The committee had a number of suggestions for the Board, which will take an entire meeting to examine and explore. Val Hortiguela began the process for the Board by asking the Board to consider the following:

  • The Safehaven Project for Community Living becoming Safehaven
  • That we adopt the line art recently developed for thank you cards as our graphic image.
  • Safehaven does not have a distinct identity in the community
  • We need to get our message out to the public
  • Safehaven does not define the care we are giving
  • www.safehaven.to has been reserved for the organization
  • Safehaven needs to have a core message and the ability to tell it's story
  • Needs a spokesperson
  • Keep Safehaven and invest in communication, marketing, media relations, etc.
  • Asked Board to consider the tag line "special children, special people, especially normal."

There was consensus that the organization should drop "Project for Community Living" from its name and that the line art was an appropriate/effective graphic depiction. There was considerable debate regarding the proposed tag line.

Board were very appreciative of work done by Nancy Coldham, Val Hortiguela, Glenn Archinoff and Susan Gudofsky. Reputation Audit committee recommendations will be considered in light of the suggested strategic directions and the decision regarding whether Safehaven will be a children's and adults organization.

7) President's report:

President's report had been discussed throughout the meeting.

8) Any other business that may be brought forth:

(i) Executive Directors Report:

Beverley Gordon reported on the following:

  • Bloor had an excellent summer experience being able to partner with the ROM and Science Centre.
  • Addition of at least 2 students per location dramatically increased the summer opportunities
  • Half of the summer students have been hired as Safehaven's employees
  • Safehaven has been nominated by the Board of Trade for its business excellence award
  • Recruitment continues for Director of Operations.
  • A Bloor Family Advisory committee has been established to look at new programming initiatives, occupancy trends and getting the Safehaven respite word out on the street.
  • Timber Lane had successfully complete a rigorous license process
  • Safehaven is in discussions with the North York building department to remedy it's building violations
  • Safehaven has resumed it's active student placement program.

Beverley Gordon has been asked to apply for a position on the Board of Ronald McDonald House Charities

9) Date of next meetings:

a. Board reminded of AGM meeting on October 17, 2006 at 6:30pm at 1173 Bloor Street West, Toronto, Ontario.
b. Special Strategic Planning Meeting: Oct 24, 2006 at 7:00pm at 1173 Bloor St. W
c. Nov 14, 2006 at 7:00pm at 1173 Bloor St. W
d. Dec 12, 2006 at 7:00pm at 1173 Bloor St. W

10) ADJOURNMENT:
  

MOTION: Richard Bogoroch
SECOND: André Laurent
CARRIED: That the meeting be adjourned at 9:00 p.m.


Recorded by Beverley Gordon

  

The Safehaven Project for Community Living // 1173 Bloor Street West, Toronto, ON, M6H 1M9
t. 416.535.8525 // f. 416.535.9782 // info@safehaven.to